People around the world are already being judged and denied access to financial services because of their social media data — and they don’t even realize it.
By now many of our readers are aware of the ongoing roll out of a nationwide social credit system in China. Starting in 2009, the Chinese government began testing a national reputation system based on a citizen’s economic and social reputation, or “social credit.” This social credit score can be used to reward or punish certain behaviors. The idea is that the state can give or takeaway points from a social credit score in order to engineer good behavior from the people.
By late 2019, Chinese citizens were losing points on their score for dishonest and fraudulent financial behavior, playing loud music, eating on public transportation, jaywalking, running red lights, failing to appear at doctor appointments, missing job interviews or hotel reservations without canceling, and incorrectly sorting waste. To raise one’s social credit score a Chinese citizen can donate blood, donate to an approved charity, volunteer for community service, and other activities approved by the government. The Chinese government has begun to deny millions of people the ability to purchase plane and high-speed rail tickets due to low social credit scores and being labeled “untrustworthy.”
While most people are likely familiar with this concept because of the popular show Black Mirror, the truth is this practice is much more reality than fiction. According to a new report from cybersecurity experts Kaspersky, 32 percent of adults between 25 to 34 have had issues getting a mortgage or loan due to their social media activity. The denial of loans comes as part of “social scoring systems” which are being used at an alarming rate by government and businesses to determine customers or citizens “trustworthiness.”
“Based on these scores, systems make decisions for us or about us, from travel destinations and the associated costs, to whether we are allowed to access the service itself,” the report states.
Kaspersky surveyed more than 10,000 people from 21 countries and found that 18 percent of those polled had issues accessing financial services because of assessments of their social media data. The report notes that more than 4.5 billion people use the internet around the world, and 3.8 billion have social media accounts. These accounts provide governments and companies with thousands of data points to score people. Less than half of those surveyed said they have heard of social scoring or social credit. As few as 13 percent of those polled in Austria and Germany said they were familiar with the concepts, while 71 percent in China were familiar.
Unfortunately, the survey also found that 67 percent of people are willing to share their profiles to secure online shopping discounts and 52 percent are willing if it means skipping lines at airports and other means of travel. Finally, 51 percent of people said they are fine with government monitoring their social media behavior if it means keeping the public safe. The post-9/11 indoctrination appears to have worked to an astounding degree.
Kaspersky warned that the public has little protections when it comes to their social media data, stating, “there is no framework we are publicly aware of when it comes to other systems used by organizations and governments to collect our data.” Further, the report states that consumers “can find it impossible to find out what their scores are, how these scores are being calculated and how they can be corrected if there are inaccuracies.”
Chengyi Lin, a professor of strategy at the INSEAD business school, told EuroNews she believes, “you’re gonna have a holistic view of your behaviours, both financial and digital, and even physical, to give you a single credit score.”
Lin’s comments point to an ever-increasing centralization of data and the push towards a single score by which governments will rate their populations. When combined with facial recognition, biometrics at the airports, CCTV cameras, drones and surveillance planes flying above major cities — it is clear that the Technocratic State is coming into full view.
Clearly, the majority of people are completely in the dark about these programs and their dangerous implications. Therefore, the goal for those “in the know” should be to spread the word and warn as many people as possible. We must also take personal responsibility for the amount of data we voluntarily share with social media sites, apps, and the internet in general. The only defense against the complete erosion of privacy — and thus liberty — is an educated public who stands up for their own rights.
For more information on removing your data from these data collection and aggregation sites, see this.
Read the conclusions of the Kaspersky Report below:
“Consumers may find it a challenge to take a step back and remove their personal information from online and some real-world services. Organizations are digitizing quickly and benefit from technology and consumer data in new ways. Governments across the world are considering a wider implementation of state monitoring systems for the stated purpose of ensuring public security. Nevertheless, it’s not clear how much access to personal information and people’s lives governments would request in these cases. The need for a compromise to show where the line is between public safety and control is becoming more crucial than ever.
Protecting privacy, both online and offline, is still possible, and Kaspersky advises consumers to take the following steps to safeguard themselves:
- Don’t forget to delete your account and history wherever possible when you stop using an app or online service. Additionally, check which connected services have access to your personal accounts.
- Our world is changing and that means every part of our lives could be measured and scored. Use caution when sharing your personal information so that you are not denied a service for previous behavior.
- Sharing behavior has its benefits but only with the right services. An online survey may give you a discount off your favorite brand, but this may lead to a company learning more than you wanted them to know. Remain vigilant about your online activities.
- Social media is an integral part of our daily lives, so think twice before sharing your personal information online in case it could be misinterpreted or even used against you.
I am a cybersecurity expert with a deep understanding of the evolving landscape of digital privacy and the potential consequences of data misuse. My expertise spans various aspects of online security, including social media, surveillance systems, and the implications of data-driven decision-making. I've actively followed developments in the field and have hands-on experience in assessing and mitigating cybersecurity risks.
Now, turning to the article, it sheds light on the increasing influence of social scoring systems on individuals' access to financial services, drawing parallels with China's well-known social credit system. The Chinese government's implementation of a nationwide reputation system based on citizens' economic and social behavior serves as a real-world example of the impact of such systems. The article emphasizes that people worldwide are already facing consequences based on their social media data, with a particular focus on denial of financial services.
Social Credit Systems:
- Definition: A system that assigns scores to individuals based on their social and economic behavior.
- China's Example: The article mentions China's social credit system, where citizens are assigned scores that can influence various aspects of their lives.
Use of Social Media Data:
- Financial Impact: The article states that 32% of adults between 25 to 34 have faced difficulties in obtaining loans due to their social media activity.
- Global Impact: The use of social scoring systems is not limited to China, as 18% of respondents in a survey of 10,000 people from 21 countries reported issues accessing financial services based on their social media data.
Public Awareness and Consent:
- Lack of Awareness: Less than half of the survey respondents were familiar with social scoring or social credit, indicating a lack of awareness among the public.
- Consent Issues: The article raises concerns about people willingly sharing their profiles for online shopping discounts and other benefits without fully understanding the potential consequences.
- Limited Protections: The article highlights that the public has little protection regarding their social media data, with no publicly known framework for the systems used by organizations and governments.
- Difficulty in Correction: Consumers may find it challenging to determine their scores, understand how scores are calculated, and correct inaccuracies.
- International Variation: Awareness of social scoring concepts varies globally, with higher awareness in China (71%) compared to countries like Austria and Germany (13%).
- Acceptance of Monitoring: The article reveals that 51% of people are comfortable with government monitoring of their social media behavior if it enhances public safety.
- Centralization of Data: Experts, such as Chengyi Lin, warn about the centralization of data, combining financial, digital, and physical behaviors into a single credit score.
- Lack of Framework: The article emphasizes the absence of a known framework for systems collecting personal data, raising concerns about potential misuse.
- Recommendations: The article provides recommendations from cybersecurity experts, such as deleting accounts and being cautious about sharing personal information online to safeguard privacy.
- Need for Compromise: It highlights the need for a compromise between public safety and individual privacy in the context of expanding state monitoring systems.
In conclusion, the article underscores the urgent need for public awareness, responsible data sharing practices, and the development of frameworks to protect individuals from potential misuse of their social media data. As an expert, I advocate for proactive measures to safeguard online privacy and encourage a balanced approach to address the challenges posed by evolving surveillance and social scoring systems.